Kopterit.net

UUSI HARRASTAJA, aloita tästä => Kopterit - Aloittelijan kysymykset ja vastaukset => Aiheen aloitti: eriks - 21 Maaliskuu, 2013, 17:04:54

Otsikko: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: eriks - 21 Maaliskuu, 2013, 17:04:54

Hi!

what FBL controller would you recomend  for 3D beginner... I can fly normal a bit acrobatics but need some support

Erik

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: Naamis - 21 Maaliskuu, 2013, 18:46:43

Always a matter of opinion, but I recommend Brain.

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: Toeh - 21 Maaliskuu, 2013, 18:57:57

BeastX is really easy to set up and works fine.

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: TuukkaJK - 21 Maaliskuu, 2013, 19:21:30

Plus one for the BeastX. Really easy to setup and doesn't need a computer to setup or fine tune.

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: Jussi. - 23 Maaliskuu, 2013, 18:42:00

Boils down to whether you like to do the setup with computer or not.

Computer: MSH Brain, vBar
No Computer: BeastX or CGY750

Personal, possibly skewed opinion:
When it comes to flight characteristics, with Brain you are a bit more connected to heli,  beastX doe's the trick very well also but you feel a bit external. It is a matter of taste. With CGY, there is ton's of things to tweak but it flies also quite well with defaults. I have never flown anything with vBar but track record is obvious, it's good.

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: JuhoV - 23 Maaliskuu, 2013, 19:28:09

I think that Align 3gx is posiblle program with computer or whit out. It´s not bad, better than beast-x.

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: eriks - 25 Maaliskuu, 2013, 11:35:57

thanks for your posts  8)

any body have experience with iKON Flybarless System iKON1001
they have Auto Level Technology - does it saves from crashes?

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: Tohtori R - 25 Maaliskuu, 2013, 11:43:57

Lainaus käyttäjältä: eriks -  25 Maaliskuu, 2013, 11:35:57

thanks for your posts  8)

any body have experience with iKON Flybarless System iKON1001
they have Auto Level Technology - does it saves from crashes?

as far as i know that thing is same as "Brain" only with different brand.

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: Toeh - 25 Maaliskuu, 2013, 15:33:22

Lainaus käyttäjältä: Tohtori R -  25 Maaliskuu, 2013, 11:43:57

as far as i know that thing is same as "Brain" only with different brand.

And what I have read about it, better hit throttle hold than auto level.

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: heikkit - 25 Maaliskuu, 2013, 17:05:57

Lainaus käyttäjältä: Toeh -  25 Maaliskuu, 2013, 15:33:22

And what I have read about it, better hit throttle hold than auto level.

That's the old school way. I bet the auto level has potential, but it is still quite experimental & most of us are used to trottle hold.

Brain auto level e.g., does not take care of tail orientation. That is difficult for beginners.

Otsikko: Vs: FBL controller
Kirjoitti: mnentwig - 25 Maaliskuu, 2013, 19:46:12

>> they have Auto Level Technology

Those will be standard in a couple of years for cheap RTF helis, but how is it supposed to work when you have to set it up (and test-fly it) yourself?
Most people can't stay mentally sharp for the whole flight duration. No, it's a skill that needs to be practised, and it takes a long time to learn. With auto-level, you train instead to flick the switch when a black-out is coming.
Dead end, IMHO, can't remember any success stories, only failure (and the only way not to crash is not to fly).